<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Commentaires sur : L’éviteur d’axe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/eviteur-daxe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/eviteur-daxe/</link>
	<description>le blog du Dr. Goulu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Howard J. Wilk</title>
		<link>http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/eviteur-daxe/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard J. Wilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/leviteur-daxe/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I just realized that there is a difference between the SolidWorks device and the old-magazine device:  the SolidWorks device has the arc-shaped pieces on both sides whereas the old-magazine device has just one arc-shaped piece; the other side of the cable is attached to an axle for the &quot;gear.&quot;  What I had thought up was the two-arc version, but I would expect that the one-arc version would work better (less friction).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just realized that there is a difference between the SolidWorks device and the old-magazine device:  the SolidWorks device has the arc-shaped pieces on both sides whereas the old-magazine device has just one arc-shaped piece; the other side of the cable is attached to an axle for the &laquo;&nbsp;gear.&nbsp;&raquo;  What I had thought up was the two-arc version, but I would expect that the one-arc version would work better (less friction).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Howard J. Wilk</title>
		<link>http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/eviteur-daxe/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard J. Wilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/leviteur-daxe/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>In a strange coincidence (another one with the Feynman book below), I was designing a mechanical device and encountered the need for a &quot;shaft passer&quot; (though I didn&#039;t know it by name at the time and didn&#039;t know if it ever existed).  What I designed was exactly the same mechanism as shown.  Very shortly thereafter, I read the above-referenced passage in the Feynman book.

It turned out I didn&#039;t need one.

Is there any reference confirming that the Germans ever used the device?

BTW, Feynman misspelled the place name.  It is the Frankford Arsenal, not Frankfort.  I live in Philadelphia and it&#039;s a common place name (Frankford Arsenal, Frankford Avenue, etc).

When I was a boy I used to look at stream water under a microscope.  I often saw paramecia.  I always wanted to see an amoeba but never did.  One time as the water droplet was drying up, I saw what I thought was an amoeba at the receding edge of the droplet.  It was my misfortune, I thought, to see an amoeba for just a second, until the drying overtook it.

I believed that for years, until I read Feynman&#039;s description of a paramecium losing its shape and becoming amoeba-like.  Feynman wrote that he had never read about such a thing; I had never read it until I read Feynman&#039;s book, and I haven&#039;t read it since.  It&#039;s not even in the wikipedia paramecium entry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a strange coincidence (another one with the Feynman book below), I was designing a mechanical device and encountered the need for a &laquo;&nbsp;shaft passer&nbsp;&raquo; (though I didn&#8217;t know it by name at the time and didn&#8217;t know if it ever existed).  What I designed was exactly the same mechanism as shown.  Very shortly thereafter, I read the above-referenced passage in the Feynman book.</p>
<p>It turned out I didn&#8217;t need one.</p>
<p>Is there any reference confirming that the Germans ever used the device?</p>
<p>BTW, Feynman misspelled the place name.  It is the Frankford Arsenal, not Frankfort.  I live in Philadelphia and it&#8217;s a common place name (Frankford Arsenal, Frankford Avenue, etc).</p>
<p>When I was a boy I used to look at stream water under a microscope.  I often saw paramecia.  I always wanted to see an amoeba but never did.  One time as the water droplet was drying up, I saw what I thought was an amoeba at the receding edge of the droplet.  It was my misfortune, I thought, to see an amoeba for just a second, until the drying overtook it.</p>
<p>I believed that for years, until I read Feynman&#8217;s description of a paramecium losing its shape and becoming amoeba-like.  Feynman wrote that he had never read about such a thing; I had never read it until I read Feynman&#8217;s book, and I haven&#8217;t read it since.  It&#8217;s not even in the wikipedia paramecium entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Par : Dr. Goulu</title>
		<link>http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/eviteur-daxe/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Goulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 05:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drgoulu.com/2005/12/29/leviteur-daxe/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>L&#039;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaft_passer&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article &quot;shaft passer&quot; de la wikipedia anglaise&lt;/a&gt; mentionne cette page comme référence et cherchait une illustration. J&#039;ai fait don des images de mon modèle SolidWorks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>L&#8217;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaft_passer" rel="nofollow">article &laquo;&nbsp;shaft passer&nbsp;&raquo; de la wikipedia anglaise</a> mentionne cette page comme référence et cherchait une illustration. J&#8217;ai fait don des images de mon modèle SolidWorks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: drgoulu.com @ 2012-05-17 15:49:03 by W3 Total Cache -->
